[2013] Comparison of Residual Strength-Grounding Damage Index Diagrams…
페이지 정보
Author Admin 작성일13-11-04 14:09 Hit22,738 Count Comments0 Count관련링크
본문
International Journal of Naval Architect and Ocean Engineering, Volume 5, Number 1, Pages 47-61, 2013
Comparison of Residual Strength-Grounding Damage Index Diagrams for Tankers Produced by The ALPS/HULL ISFEM and Design Formula Method
Author(s): Do Kyun Kim, Han Byul Kim, Mohd Hairil Mohd and Jeom Kee Paik
Abstract:
This study compares the Residual ultimate longitudinal strength – grounding Damage index (R-D) diagrams produced by two analysis methods: the ALPS/HULL Intelligent Supersize Finite Element Method (ISFEM) and the design formula (modified Paik and Mansour) method – used to assess the safety of damaged ships. The comparison includes four types of double-hull oil tankers: Panamax, Aframax, Suezmax and VLCC. The R-D diagrams were calculated for a series of 50 grounding scenarios. The diagrams were efficiently sampled using the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) technique and comprehensively analysed based on ship size. Finally, the two methods were compared by statistically analysing the differences between their grounding damage indices and ultimate longitudinal strength predictions. The findings provide a useful example of how to apply the ultimate longitudinal strength analysis method to grounded ships.
Comparison of Residual Strength-Grounding Damage Index Diagrams for Tankers Produced by The ALPS/HULL ISFEM and Design Formula Method
Author(s): Do Kyun Kim, Han Byul Kim, Mohd Hairil Mohd and Jeom Kee Paik
Abstract:
This study compares the Residual ultimate longitudinal strength – grounding Damage index (R-D) diagrams produced by two analysis methods: the ALPS/HULL Intelligent Supersize Finite Element Method (ISFEM) and the design formula (modified Paik and Mansour) method – used to assess the safety of damaged ships. The comparison includes four types of double-hull oil tankers: Panamax, Aframax, Suezmax and VLCC. The R-D diagrams were calculated for a series of 50 grounding scenarios. The diagrams were efficiently sampled using the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) technique and comprehensively analysed based on ship size. Finally, the two methods were compared by statistically analysing the differences between their grounding damage indices and ultimate longitudinal strength predictions. The findings provide a useful example of how to apply the ultimate longitudinal strength analysis method to grounded ships.
Comment List
There's no comments